4 Best Home Digital Pianos Under $3000Posted on: May 7, 2022, by : CynthiaV
If you are looking for the best digital piano under $3000, continue reading this article to find the best four options we have compiled for you.
Recently, we’ve discussed a wide range of digital pianos, each with its own unique features and pricing ranges. Due to increasing interest, we’re going to take a deeper look at the best digital piano under $3000 today.
Only digital pianos that may be used in the house are included in this article. The Best Portable Digital Pianos Under $2000 may be found in our guide to the best portable pianos. The Best Home Digital Pianos Under $1500 is a great resource if you’re searching for a console digital piano but are on a limited budget.
Best Digital Piano Under $3000: Quick Overview
Your understanding of console digital pianos and how they vary from other models should be solid by now. Let’s have a look at console digital pianos in this price range to see what you can anticipate from them.
Spending that much money on equipment is a significant deal for many individuals, so be sure you’re investing wisely. The premium digital piano features a big, elegant body similar to that of an acoustic piano, which is the most noticeable distinction between it and its sub-models.
Front legs, a top cover that can be opened, a multi-speaker sound system, and other features make the digital piano appear more like a genuine one. Finish options are usually available in most circumstances.
However, the most critical aspect to consider is the quality of the sound and the realism of the touch. The most recent and cutting-edge technology is generally available on a high-quality home digital piano, depending on the brand.
Hammer wrenches that incorporate a hardwood wrench and acoustic swing mechanisms are also included.
The acoustic characteristics of the samples are also represented in great detail, making them rich and seamless in the sound. Overall, this piano is as near to a genuine piano as feasible in terms of sound, feel, and appearance.
The most practical console virtual pianos under $3,000, in our opinion, are those we’ve already addressed in terms of their core features, such as the ones we’ve selected for this list.
The typical 4-five virtual pianos have been selected, but this time I’m going to try to go a little further and cover a few product collections as well. Many of them have the same design philosophy, similar feature sets, and the same end users’ goals.
4 Best Digital Pianos Under $3000
1. Yamaha CLP-735
BUY ON GUITARCENTER
Among digital keyboards, Yamaha is one of the most well-known brands. When it comes to acoustic piano manufacturing, they have a significant edge because of their extensive experience and skill.
Yamaha pianos are available in just about every price range you can think of. For the most discerning home pianist, the Clavinova line of premium pianos is the ideal solution. Fans have flocked to the show for decades, and it has gained a cult-like following over time.
It’s important to keep in mind that each gadget in the collection has a basic motion mechanism, sound, and feature set that is the same for all.
The size of the cabinet is by far the most noticeable variation in appearance. Virtual pianos (no longer just Clavinovas) with a polished finish cost around 15% more than those with a non-finished finish.
As of July 2020, Yamaha is launching a new Clavinova CLP7xx series, which includes significant updates to both the “touch” and the “sound” aspects of the instrument. The Clavinova CLP735 is the entry-level model in the Clavinova line. The sounds and functions that are pre-installed are rather rudimentary.
In spite of this, it comes with the same high-quality grand piano samples as all other models in the series Both the Yamaha CFX 9-foot grand and the Bösendorfer Imperial Grand are included in this collection, making it a “Rolls Royce” among acoustic pianos. No one needs an introduction to this best digital piano under $3000, which continues to be the focal point of world-renowned music halls and venues.
The CFX has a bright, precise tone, while the Bösendorfer has a woodier, mellow sound with a wide dynamic range. In the CLP7xx series, CFX and Bösendorfer voices have one more sample layer compared to the preceding model.
When using headphones, you’ll get the full benefit of CFX binaural sampling (the Bösendorfer is accessible on higher-end versions). If you’re using headphones, you’ll hear a more “three-dimensional” sound because of the way the samples were captured. When binaural sampling was first introduced, CFX tones were the only ones to benefit.
GEM (Grand Expression Modeling) technology has been added to all CLP7xx models in order to accurately mimic the sound of gaming touch.
Virtual Resonance Modeling (VRM), which replicates numerous acoustic qualities including string resonance, damper resonance, double-scale resonance, and cabinet resonance, is another major development in the CLP7xx models.
The CLP725 and CLP735 use Yamaha’s innovative GrandTouchS key function, which might be a little perplexing for first-time players. The GrandTouchS seems to have two models, one with white wooden keys (based on the prior NWX action) and the other with plastic keys (as opposed to the previous NWX) (based on the previous GH3X action).
Since both stocks are based on the same platform as the GH3 series, they have a similar look and feel. The black keys’ improved shaft length is the most notable change, since it makes it much simpler to play the deeper keys.
Not to be confused with Yamaha’s flagship GrandTouch key movement utilized in the more expensive Clavinova models, the new GrandTouch-S (‘S’ stands for ‘Small’) is a smaller version.
Both the CLP-725 and CLP-735 distinguish the GrandTouch-S plastic model. In addition to the YDP-164, several other Yamaha instruments employ the GH3 key action, which is similar to this one (the primary distinction is the delivered escapement simulation with inside the GrandTouch-S movement).
In no way, shape, or form would I describe this key movement as particularly spectacular; but, it is by no means any worse. There’s a noticeable weight to the non-wood GrandTouch-S, no longer a lot of “soar back” action, and a nice-feeling ebony and ivory-simulated key-top feel.
It’s still a decent movement for the price, but I like the somewhat lighter and more sensitive wood GrandTouch-S utilized in the CLP-745 variant.
This image does not include any of the new key movements, but the older key moves are shown (for reference) considering how nice the CLP-725 is, you may be wondering why I chose the CLP-735 for this list of the best digital piano under $3000 instead of it.
But that’s really because the CLP-725 lacks much more than a few great samples and an OK keyboard in terms of features. As a result, you should keep in mind that the CLP-735 is the next edition up in the series.
You’ll receive the same sound engine and key motion as the CLP-725, but here are some of the extras you’ll get.
- The tiny LCD screen provides a more user-friendly interface.
- The CLP735 features 38 instrument voices compared to the CLP725, which only has 10 voices.
- 12 extra master effects are among the other sound effects and settings (depending on the voice selected).
- There are 303 tunes in this set, one for each hand part.
- 250 songs may be stored on a 16-track MIDI recorder. Only one song, with up to two tracks, may be recorded and stored on the CLP725.
- Convenient WAV audio recorder that allows you to record and play back WAV files (sampling rate 44.1kHz, 16bit, stereo).
- There are six more factors to examine in addition to the classic temperament.
- Four powerful speakers two each having 30W and the others 20W each
- MIDI in/out, line out (right, left/mono), audio micro jack, and USB storage connection round out the list of available interfaces (for storing audio recordings).
The CLP735 has a lot of advantages, but you have to decide whether the price difference is worth it. Yes, in my view. But why pay more if you’re not going to use the additional features and sound?
The Yamaha CLP745 is the next model in the CLP series. There is a substantial price difference between the CLP745 and the CLP735, which may appear excessive to some.).
To that end, the following modifications have been made:
- The secret to GrandTouchS. In contrast, the white keys are constructed of genuine wood and have a somewhat different feel than the black ones. For whatever reason, it behaves differently than the GrandTouchS in plastic and provides more precise control.
- A pair of 50-watt speakers (16cm x 8cm) and another a pair of 30-watt speakers (16cm).
- Bluetooth (MIDI + Audio) is pre-installed.
- A large music stand with a metal page holder (Plastic on CLP735).
It may seem as though there aren’t enough new features to warrant the price hike, but improvements to the keyboard, speakers, and more all make sense. In the end, it’s always best to conduct your own research and make your own decisions rather than wasting money on stuff you don’t need.
To others, the difference in touch may be inconsequential, and if you mostly play with headphones the more powerful speakers may not be as relevant. Nonetheless, the CLP735 has a following. The CLP735 and CLP745, in my view, are the finest value for money.
If you’re on a tight budget, try the Yamaha YDP184, the top of the Arius line. Don’t be alarmed just yet. In fact, the YDP184 has more in common with the Clavinova series than with the Arius series.
Many of the YDP184’s features are shared with the CLP735 including a tiny LCD display, CFX grand piano tones, VRM technology and two 30W speakers (although there are no instructional tunes or audio recordings).
There is a major distinction between the YDP184 and the Clavinova series in that it doesn’t have a Bösendorfer Imperial tone. CFX tones, on the other hand, do not include binaural samples. Despite their similarity, the YDP184 is much less expensive than the CLP735 and CLP745.
The Yamaha CLP775 will be the successor of the CLP745 in the Clavinova line. In the beginning, it seemed that Yamaha would not be making this model accessible in the United States.
There are just four significant differences between the CLP775 and the CLP745. Yamaha’s flagship keyboard mechanism, the GrandTouch, is included in the CLP775 model. Each key has its own weight and is placed on an ivory or an ebony surface.
In contrast to the GrandTouchS keys, the white keys are constructed of wood, and their hinge length is similar to that of a genuine piano’s. I wouldn’t be shocked if some believed the CLP745’s mechanics were more responsive and pleasurable to play since they are substantially heavier than the wooden GrandTouchS.
The speaker system of this best digital piano under $3000 has a total output power of 284W and includes six speakers (versus four for the CLP745) (200W for the CLP745). Pedaling precision is enhanced by the CLP775’s piano-like GP Response Damper Pedal, which Yamaha labels the “GP” for “Grand Piano” response.
Finally, all of the CLP775’s controls are touch-sensitive, with the exception of the power button. Though the flagship CLP785 is far out of our price range, it’s worth a shot for those who want the greatest piano sound possible. More inbuilt sound and an improved sound system are two of the most significant upgrades over the CLP775’s vertical architecture.
Two CLP models have “GP” at the end, and you may have noticed this. The CLP765GP and CLP795GP have a grand piano-like body; hence this letter is important on its own. The CLP765GP is a junior version of the CLP735 that is almost similar (another amplification system).
Instead, the series’ most sophisticated model is the CLP795GP. While it differs in appearance from the flagship CLP785, it has all of the impressive features you’d expect from a digital piano of this class.
Even while Clavinova instruments aren’t ideal, they should surely be on the shortlist of alternatives for those looking for a piano. CLP735 and YDP184 are excellent choices if you’re on a budget.
2. Kawai CA59
BUY ON SWEETWATER
Kawai is the first name that comes to mind when considering a high-quality digital piano for home usage. To put it mildly, the firm has an excellent track record in this field. As a long-time admirer of their consoles, I’ll be taking a closer look at their high-end home series today. Let’s take a closer look at the CA and CN series, respectively, to see how they stack up.
Although the CA digital piano from Kawai’s top-of-the-line home series seems better than the CN model, this is not always the case. Let’s figure out why this is happening!
When Kawai introduced the CA49 and CA59 models, the border between the CN and CA series got even more blurred. The CA model is known for its amazing hardwood keystroke travel, which can be found even in lower-level pianos from the CA brand.
Kawai’s Grand Feel III movement is found in the CA79 and CA99 models, which retail for more than $3,000 each (the successor to the Grand Feel II). Realistic wooden keys that are roughly the same size as an acoustic piano’s white keys. Although this isn’t called a hybrid key operation, it’s a lot like one.
The Grand Feel III’s keyboard mechanism is unquestionably the most lifelike of any digital piano’s available mechanisms (not the hybrid). The Grand Feel III’s feel and responsiveness just cannot be matched by the Yamaha’s plastic GrandTouchS.
In comparison to folding plastic keys, vibrating wooden keys, such as those on the Grand Feel III, offer an advantage since their design is more closely related to that of an acoustic piano. This, in turn, allows for longer key revolutions and more authentic touches.
Newer, more cost-effective models have replaced their older sister models. The Grand Feel Compact is a more compact version of the Grand Feel III that does not have the premium Grand Feel III slides (GFC).
In addition, the white keys in this motion are formed of real wood sticks and have a swing pattern. However, the full-length GFIII has a 15 percent shorter impact time. Both techniques, in fact, are quite tactile and simple to do.
With a pivot axis length greater than the GFC key, the GFC is simpler to play behind the key. Ivory-touched keys are also included, as is the use of an integrated weight hammer and counterweight as well as a trigger (trigger).
There is no wooden key on the CN model, which makes it distinct from the CA line. Instead, use a Responsive Hammer III, a plastic folding wrench (RHIII). Kawai’s greatest plastic key is addressed in our Kawai ES8 review, which you can read here.
The RHIII is revered by pianists and has a pleasant feel to it, much like the wooden Kawai mechanism. It’s hard to put into words how much nicer the hardwood swing mechanism feels than either the GFC or GFIII (excellent in detail).
The sound quality of CA instruments is not necessarily superior to that of CN versions. The sound generator of the CN39 is more sophisticated than the one in the CA49.
Their acoustic properties dictate which ones are placed where. In order of ascending complexity, CA99 is superior to CA79, CA59, CN39, and both CA49 and CN29.
Here are the remaining four models that fall inside the price range of under $3,000. Kawai’s Progressive Harmonic Imaging midrange sound engine is included in the CN29, CN39, and CA49 (PHI).
PHI, on the other hand, lacks the Harmonic Imaging XL generator found in the CA59, which delivers longer and more comprehensive samples.
Both sound engines, on the other hand, make use of samples taken from the outstanding Kawai SKEX and EX concert grand pianos. Because the sonic properties of the samples range significantly from those of the Yamaha CFX and Bösendorfer samples, you will find some to be more pleasurable than others based on your past experience and personal preference with acoustic pianos.
Because manufacturers employ the most up-to-date technology in their products at this price range, there is no one tool on our list that stands out as the obvious winner. I like the organic, warm tones produced by cutesy instruments. It is often advised for individuals who wish to get as near to an acoustic experience as possible.
The CN29 and CA49 versions are quite comparable in terms of sound and operation (if not identical). Both include 19 built-in sounds, 192 notes of polyphony, and 40W speakers, and they are both portable (four for the CA49 and two for the CN29).
Additionally, in Virtual Technician, you will find complete SKEX and EX grand piano models, as well as string and damper resonance modeling, as well as 17 additional sound characteristics that may be customized. This contains delicate elements such as damper noise, ambient noise, top simulation, voice, and other such things as well.
In terms of piano sound, the CN39 features a more sophisticated version of the PHI sound engine, which makes it more akin to the CA59 (which is utilized by the Harmonic Imaging XL) than the CA59. Both best digital pianos under $3000 are equipped with SKEX, SK5 and EX grand piano sounds, 256-note polyphony, and a slew of user-adjustable options available via the Virtual Technician function on the Virtual Technician software.
These two models, in addition to simulating string resonance and damper resonance, also mimic undammed string resonance as well as body resonance.
Despite the fact that the CN39 has a low-cost sound engine, This best digital piano under $3000offers a number of benefits over the CA59. The CN39, in example, has a far greater selection of non-piano sounds (355 vs 44), making it a better option if you want a more diverse sound palette that includes drums, synthesizers, choirs, guitars, and other non-piano instruments in addition to piano.
The CA59, on the other hand, features a speaker system that is 100 times more powerful than the 40W, a more detailed multisample (due to its superior sound engine), and so on. At the very least, from the perspective of a pianist, I believe this best digital piano under $3000 is more significant than making hundreds of sounds.
The features of CN39 and CA59 are very comparable to one another. When compared to the CN29 / CA49, it offers 24 more sound effects, more Concert Magic songs, more onboard lessons, a 2-track MIDI recorder, an audio recorder, a line out/in connection, and a USB flash drive port, to name a few features.
When comparing these instruments, it may be overwhelming and confusing since certain characteristics of the CN piano are better than the entry-level CA series models, and the opposite is true in the other.
BUY ON AMAZON
No list would be complete if it did not include instruments made by Roland. Roland, in contrast to Yamaha and Kawai, is not particularly concerned with providing a traditional acoustic playing experience. Instead, their instruments are fun and adaptable, and they are well-known for their more contemporary design.
Roland provides a diverse selection of home digital pianos to meet the demands and budgets of musicians of all ages and backgrounds. In this post, we’ll concentrate on the intermediate HP and DP series, as well as provide you with rapid access to the premium LX models, which retail for far more than the specified budget.
At the time of writing, Roland’s new HP700 series (which includes the HP702 and HP704) was still available, as were the previous HP601, HP603, and HP605, which were introduced in late 2018. In other words, Roland did not immediately discontinue the HP600 series in favor of the HP700 series of printers.
Because the new HP700 model does not have many new functions, I do not believe it is a significant improvement over the previous HP600 model. Regardless, let us examine the most significant element of these tools, the sound generator, along with the primary activities that these tools are used for.
To distinguish them from their predecessors, save for the HP702, all HP models have Roland PHA50 key mechanisms that include wood/plastic hybrid keys, a false escapement, and ebony or ivory composite key surfaces. This movement does not seem to be tied to sonic experience in any way; yet, it looks to be quite responsive and pleasurable to play.
It’s neither too heavy nor too light, it’s quick, and it has a lengthy key hinge length, all of which are desirable characteristics. The PHA50 is also quite adaptable, and it’s easy to see it being used to play electric pianos, guitars, synthesizers, and other sounds in addition to classical piano.
As of this writing, the HP702 is the only HP model to make use of the PHA4 Standard low-level mechanism, which can be found in Roland’s entry-level digital pianos such as the FP30 and RP102, among others.
The action is by no means horrible, but it isn’t nearly as fun as PHA50, at least not in my opinion. In particular, playing the keyboard might be challenging due to the fact that the keyboard’s axis of rotation is visibly short.
As also, as you press the keys harder, such as while playing fortissimo, the sound becomes somewhat louder. In general, the PHA50 is characterized as being smoother and more expressive than the PHA4 Standard in terms of sound. Another aspect of this best digital piano under $3000 is that it has an upgraded version of the SuperNATURAL sound engine known as SuperNATURAL piano modeling, which allows you to create realistic piano sounds.
Unlike the less expensive SuperNATURAL version, which generates the piano sound using a hybrid sampling approach, this sound processor generates the piano sound by pure modeling.
As an alternative to triggering an already-recorded acoustic piano sound, the instrument employs sophisticated mathematical algorithms to generate a new sound from scratch. Because this technique does not need the storage of GBs of sample data, it can be shown that the simulated sound often includes a limitless number of polyphonic layers.
I won’t go into great detail about the advantages and disadvantages of the modeling technique here since we’ve already covered them in the Roland review piece. Unlike digital pianos from other manufacturers, such as Yamaha and Kawai, the “full modeling” technique is not typically encountered with these instruments. More conventional methodologies, sample-based approaches, and sometimes hybrid ways are used in this context (modeling only specific negative elements).
Try to listen to as many different noises as you can since you won’t be able to identify which one is your favorite. Sampling and modeling are two things that I like doing.
Interestingly, despite the premium PHA50 movement, the HP601 is the only instrument in the HP series that employ a simpler (sample-based) version of SuperNATURAL, while all other instruments in the HP series do.
The HP702, a more compact device, also employs a simulation-based SuperNATURAL generator, but with poorer standard PHA4 key behavior than the other variants. The HP603 / HP603A is the most affordable HP model that has both PHA50 keys and a fully modeled piano sound (HP603A is the same model as the HP603 but with Bluetooth audio).
Aside from being more compact and contemporary in appearance, the Roland DP603 is almost similar to the Roland HP603. When compared to the HP603, it is more economical and provides greater value for money.
The HP605 is the next model in line, and it is quite similar to the HP603. Main differences include a bigger cabinet and a more advanced speaker system that includes six speakers (with a total output of 74W), as opposed to the HP603, which has just two speakers (with an output of 60W) (60W).
In fact, this means that the HP605 offers deeper, deeper bass with a more immersive sound field than the previous model. These devices, on the other hand, provide a nearly identical experience when played over a pair of headphones.
When it comes to playing, the newly introduced HP704′′ features a redesigned casing design and is fairly comparable to the HP605′′ in terms of performance. The most noticeable variation is the speaker configuration. The HP704 features a four-speaker sound system that is somewhat less powerful than the HP704 (60W output).
As you can see, the distinctions between the HP601, HP603, HP605, HP702, and HP704 are mostly connected to the cabinet design, sound generator, speaker, and key motion of the various models in the HP series.
These models are quite similar in terms of functionality. It has over 350 preset songs, approximately 300 built-in sounds (53 main tones plus basic GM2 accompaniment tones), a three-track digital MIDI recording and audio recording function, a small LCD screen to make navigation more convenient, Bluetooth connectivity (both MIDI and audio), an audio input socket (excluding HP601), and a dedicated line output socket (excluding HP601) for streaming music from your smartphone to the built-in speaker.
The “traditional posture” of the lid on all HP models is a unique design characteristic that distinguishes them from the competition. It conceals all of the piano’s controls and provides the instrument an acoustic-like, unobtrusive appearance. This is a very amazing feature.
All things considered, there are several models to pick from, each with a design, feature set, and gaming experience that is identical to another. Considering pricing, features, sound, and touch combination, I believe the HP603 / DP603 and HP704 are the most successful models on the market now.
The Roland HP series, like other high-end digital pianos (e.g., the Kawai CA & CN), is not always simple to acquire online, particularly in the United States, but it is worth the effort. Many of the models are only available in-store, and you can’t even tell how much they’re selling for since the prices aren’t shown.
Let’s take a short look at Roland’s most costly digital pianos, the LX line, which is now available. These are not inexpensive instruments, but they are ideal for individuals who want an uncompromised piano playing experience in a beautiful setting.
All three LX models (LX705, LX706, and LX708) are equipped with the PureAcoustic sound engine, which can be found in all three versions. PureAcoustic makes use of two distinct sound processors; One for piano tones from the United States and another for piano tones from Europe.
If you want to understand more about the Roland PureAcoustic sound generator, I won’t go into depth here, but you can check out our Roland tutorial.
An additional attraction to this series is the unique enclosure, which houses an innovative multi-speaker system (four for the LX705, six for the LX706, and eight for the LX708). Furthermore, the LX706 and LX708 are equipped with an enhanced and longer version of the PHA50 keyboard, which is referred to as the Hybrid Grand keyboard.
In addition, longer motions make it simpler to play the keys backwards, which makes extended gaming sessions less exhausting.
BUY ON AMAZON
You may be shocked to see Casio tools on this list, but they are really there and accounted for. The Casio AP710 digital piano is the top-of-the-line model in the Celviano line of digital pianos. Consider the Roland DP603, Yamaha CLP735 and Kawai CN39 as direct rivals since their prices are quite comparable to the Roland DP603.
The Casio AP710 digital piano, like all of the other high-quality digital pianos on our list, exhibits the finest and most contemporary technology that Casio has produced in recent years. The piano is equipped with a beautiful vertical cabinet, six speakers, an interactive sound system, and the most sophisticated sound generator available in Casio’s arsenal of instruments.
This sound engine, which comes straight from the Casio GP Hybrid series, is at the core of the AP710’s sound production. The piano features 26 preset voices, including three Earth Grand Voices dubbed from Berlin, Hamburg, and Vienna.
The piano has 26 preset voices in total. Berlin piano tones were created in partnership with C. Bechstein, a famous German piano maker, to create a unique sound for the city. Casio specifically picked the sound of an ultra-modern 9-foot D282 grand piano for this project, and the results are rather amazing.
The cities of Hamburg and Vienna Grand are equally stunning in their own right. The sound has a wide dynamic range, a lengthy natural attenuation, and simulations of string resonances, damper resonances, damper noise, and other acoustic aspects, among other characteristics.
For the most part, the AP710’s piano sound is on par with Yamaha, Kawai, and Roland competitors. If you like the sound of Yamaha/Kawaii/Roland, you may prefer the Casio sound, but I couldn’t discover anything that made it inferior to other versions.
A six-speaker system and the AP710 provide an incredible sound. To sum up, the AP710 doesn’t have many settings that enable you to tailor every acoustic aspect (noise, resonance) exactly to your preferences.
It’s not a major concern since everything you need is there, and the sound quality is excellent. Core performance is where the AP710 falls short of its rivals. The TriSensor Scaled Hammer Action II of this best digital piano under $3000 is the same as that found on the vast majority of Privia and Celviano models.
Because the competition has far better and more realistic primary actions and because this tool is so powerful, you’d anticipate something a little more intriguing from a tool of this quality.
When we tested PX160, PX770, PX870 and other Privia models, we wrote extensively on the Scaled Hammer Action II. A 3 sensor bendy plastic key with hammer action and imitation ebony and ivory keys is what you’ll find in the name.
Compared to the primary actions stated above, this one is lighter, louder, and has a significantly shorter spindle length, as the action itself. This was a quick read (typical for lower main actions).
Although Roland and Kawai’s key movements are more pleasurable to play, the touch is still engaging despite its shortcomings.
The sense of touch is very individualistic. With less gaming expertise, it’s surprising how many individuals choose lower-level key action over the more expensive options. It’s easy to see why. There is no such thing as a “perfect” assignment to follow.
All acoustic pianos and digital pianos are unique in their own ways. In order to choose which digital piano is best for your finger, you must visit the shop and play it for yourself first.
Reading hundreds of comments and forum conversations about other people’s experiences isn’t nearly as informative or satisfying as creating your own personal learning experience.
The AP710 is as easy and uncomplicated as other digital pianos in terms of functionality.
It contains layer and split modes, two-track MIDI recorder, audio recorder, two headphone ports, line out/in, USB port for computer, USB port for device, and a few more basic functions.
Overall, the Casio AP710 is an excellent value for the money, with the only exception of its mediocre key response. There are some skilled pianists who may be put off by this because they prefer a more realistic touch and more nuanced interpretation.
The AP710 excels in terms of both audio quality and aesthetics.
When using the built-in sound system or headphones, you’ll get an amazing sound experience thanks to the 6-speaker sound system’s 256-note polyphony and three distinct “flavors” of the grand piano.
There are sophisticated tools in the Casio product range that are worth mentioning. Celviano Hybrid Grand (GP) series, for example, competes successfully with flagship instruments from Kawai and Yamaha, however the price points stated in this article are much over the price range of the GP series.
The Natural Grand Hammer movement in the GP310 and GP510 rivals Kawai’s best wooden movements, and is effectively a hybrid movement with a design that is extremely close to that of an acoustic piano.
Other Digital Pianos Under $3000 Worth Mentioning
Dexibell VIVO H1/H3/H7
Digital piano manufacturer Dexibell is a newcomer to the market. The former R&D staff of Roland Europe created this Italian startup when Roland Europe’s R&D department shut down in 2013.
In other words, it wasn’t a whole new project from the beginning.
Sound Generation (T2l Sound Technology)
Since its inception, Dexibell has been laser-focused on sound and innovation, and the company has seen significant progress in a short period of time.
T2L is the name of the advanced technology suite included in every instrument (True to Life). Real-world game simulations benefit from a combination of sampling and simulation approaches.
A “Quad Core” sound engine is one of the technology’s standout characteristics. Each tone is generated by 320 digital oscillators, each of which generates an almost infinite polyphony of small fragments.
Natural attenuation and intricate motion of each note may be captured without the need of repeat/stretch methods thanks to samples on the Dexibell instrument, which include signals lasting up to 15 seconds.
Moreover, Dexibell employs 24-bit audio data instead of the industry standard 16-bit (CD quality), which further enhances the timbre’s clarity and accuracy.
In theory, all of this is fascinating, but it doesn’t necessarily work out that way in reality. Dexibell keyboards are exempt from this rule.
My little encounter with the Vivo S7 Pro and internet demonstrations of the Vivo H series convinced me that the sound quality is excellent.
I’d even go so far as to claim that their digital piano has the greatest instrument tone I’ve ever heard. Acoustic pianos, organs, and strings aren’t the only options here; any other kind of sound is welcome as well.
Dexibell Product Lineup
Digital piano makers Clavia and Dexibell have many similarities (Nord). The S-series stage pianos from Dexibell are the company’s best-selling and most recognizable line, much like Nord’s.
Dexibell, on the other hand, offers a range of console digital pianos (the H series) for individuals who want a digital piano for their house that includes speakers and a cabinet that looks like furniture.
They feature an extremely contemporary cabinet design for their H-series digital pianos, which makes them, stand out from other manufacturers.
Those console models utilise much the same technology as their level piano counterparts, which makes them expensive but effective instruments.
Inheriting features from Dexibell-level pianos include a 1.5GB wave memory sound library, a wide range of reverb and DSP effects, and support for playing back.wav,.aiff,.mp3 audio files.
You may be wondering why I didn’t include the Dexibell H-series virtual pianos on my list given everything I’ve said thus far has been overwhelmingly favorable.
So far, we haven’t discussed the use of touch controllers on digital pianos. It’s about this point when things start to become boring.
This is a common practice among smaller keyboard makers, including Nord and Dexibell. In part, this is due to the fact that crucial design and manufacture is a highly technical and time-consuming process that these tiny businesses lack.
As a result, they must obtain the instrument’s key mechanisms from firms like Fatar (the Italian maker of key mechanisms).
Fatar keys, particularly the lower-end variants, have been a point of contention for me on this site before, so this is a significant drawback for me in a digital piano. a low-level digital control system. Although they all employ the same audio technology and are priced similarly, the Dexibell does not feature any “low-end” instruments.
In terms of piano performance, they employ Fatar’s TP100 LR main action, which isn’t anything special from the point of view of a pianist. Short spindle lengths, a spongy feel, and an unrealistic reaction are all problems with this action, as are many of the lower primary actions.
There are worse main acts out there, but I wouldn’t say that the TP100 LR is my favorite. You should not purchase it if you are primarily interested in playing the piano.
Fatar’s TP40 GH premium action is used in the Dexibell H7, which is the flagship of the H series.
It’s clear that this is the best choice for classical pianists, but even this motion is less than what we’ve seen on digital pianos from Kawai, Yamaha, and Roland thus far.
It’s hard to find any headphone that comes close to replicating the H7’s sound and feel. But since it costs more than $3,000, we decided not to include it in the package.
I hope this list of the best digital piano under $3000 has helped you to find the best piano you have been looking for.